During this Pentecost Season, there are two “Tracks” of Scriptures that are offered, and congregations may choose which Track they will follow. The first two readings presented are the readings from Tracks 1 and 2, respectively. The last two readings are the same in both Tracks.

Ruth 3:1-5, 4:13-17

Reading

1 Naomi her mother-in-law said to Ruth, “My daughter, I need to seek some security for you, so that it may be well with you. 2 Now here is our kinsman Boaz, with whose young women you have been working. See, he is winnowing barley tonight at the threshing floor. 3 Now wash and anoint yourself put on your best clothes and go down to the threshing floor; but do not make yourself known to the man until he has finished eating and drinking. 4 When he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do.” 5 She said to her, “All that you tell me I will do.”

4:13 So Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife. When they came together, the LORD made her conceive, and she bore a son. 14 Then the women said to Naomi, “Blessed be the LORD, who has not left you this day without next-of-kin; and may his name be renowned in Israel! 15 He shall be to you a restorer of life and a nourisher of your old age; for your daughter-in-law who loves you, who is more to you than seven sons, has borne him.” 16 Then Naomi took the child and laid him in her bosom and became his nurse. 17 The women of the neighborhood gave him a name, saying, “A son has been born to Naomi.” They named him Obed; he became the father of Jesse, the father of David.

Commentary

The Book of Ruth is one of the shortest books of the Bible (four chapters) and is a beautiful story of a Moabite woman (Ruth) and her devotion to her Jewish mother-in-law, Naomi. In the last chapter of the story, Ruth (with Naomi’s assistance) married a Judean relative of Naomi’s and became the great-grandmother of King David. The New Oxford Annotated Bible says: “The verbal sophistication suggests that the author was a literate member of the upper classes, a court scribe, perhaps.”

It is important to note that the Moabites were always regarded as dire enemies of Judah, and likely despoiled Jerusalem after the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.

The story is set (v.1) in the time of the Judges (1200 to 1025 BCE), a period of great turmoil and moral backsliding in Israel.

In the Christian Scriptures, the book is placed after Judges as if it were an historical book, but in the Hebrew Bible, it is placed among the Writings.

There is no consensus on when the book was written. Some suggest that its emphasis on the genealogy of David dates it to the period between the death of Solomon (930 BCE) and the conquest of Northern Israel by the Assyrians in 722 BCE.

The weight of scholarly analysis, however, dates the book to the Persian Period — after the end of the Exile (539 BCE) and before the conquest by Alexander the Great in 333 BCE. A story of a Moabite woman’s being an ancestor of King David has been seen as a reaction against the exclusivist decrees of Ezra and Nehemiah (c.450 BCE) which required Judean men to send away their non-Jewish wives (and their children by these women). The NOAB observes that the values the book proclaims are loyalty, love of family and generosity towards strangers.

In last week’s reading, Naomi (whose name means “Pleasantness”), her husband, and their two sons (whose names mean “Sickly” and “Frail”), left Bethlehem and went to Moab because of a famine in Judea. (Ironically, “Beth-lehem” means “House of Bread/Food.”)

In Moab, Naomi’s husband died, and the two sons married Moabite women, Ruth and Orpah. Ten years later, the two sons (not surprisingly) died, and the three women were left destitute.

Naomi decided to return to Judea (where the famine had ended) and urged Ruth and Orpah to stay with their own people in Moab and remarry. Orpah decided to remain in Moab, but Ruth “clung” to Naomi and swore “your people shall be my people and your God my God” (v.16).

After going to Judea with Naomi, Ruth gleaned the already harvested fields belonging to Boaz (whose name means “strength”), a kinsman of Naomi’s late husband, to obtain grain for herself and Naomi. The NAOB notes that Ruth was taking advantage of an Israelite law which required farmers to leave part of their harvest for gleaning by the poor, the alien, and the widow. Ruth was triply entitled to glean as a poor, foreign, widow.

In today’s reading, Naomi instructed Ruth to go to the threshing floor where Boaz would be sleeping and to “uncover his feet” (v.4). This could be understood literally, but most commentators point out that “feet” is a euphemism in Hebrew for private parts. In the same scene, Ruth asked Boaz to “spread his robe” (v.9) over her – a formal act of a proposal of marriage.

Boaz redeemed land that had been owned by Naomi’s husband Elimelech and married Ruth. She bore a son, Obed (v.17). Commentators agree that it is not likely that Naomi became Obed’s wet nurse (v.16), but that the child symbolized the complete reversal of Naomi’s fortunes. The Jewish Study Bible speculates that “the association of the child with Naomi rather than Ruth is meant to remove the taint of foreign birth from the child.”

Ruth is one of four women included in the genealogy of Jesus of Nazareth in Matthew’s Gospel. The others are Tamar (who seduced her father-in-law, Judah, and bore him two sons), Rahab (a prostitute in Jericho who was the mother of Boaz), and Bathsheba (the mother of Solomon who was married to Uriah when David impregnated her). The New Jerome Biblical Commentary points out that the sons born to Tamar and Ruth were in fulfillment of their levirate obligations, respectively, to Er (Gen.38:29) and Mahlon (4:17) to bear a son by their deceased husband’s kin.

1 Kings 17:8-16

Reading

8 The word of the LORD came to Elijah, saying, 9 “Go now to Zarephath, which belongs to Sidon, and live there; for I have commanded a widow there to feed you.” 10 So he set out and went to Zarephath. When he came to the gate of the town, a widow was there gathering sticks; he called to her and said, “Bring me a little water in a vessel, so that I may drink.” 11 As she was going to bring it, he called to her and said, “Bring me a morsel of bread in your hand.” 12 But she said, “As the LORD your God lives, I have nothing baked, only a handful of meal in a jar, and a little oil in a jug; I am now gathering a couple of sticks, so that I may go home and prepare it for myself and my son, that we may eat it, and die.” 13 Elijah said to her, “Do not be afraid; go and do as you have said; but first make me a little cake of it and bring it to me, and afterwards make something for yourself and your son. 14 For thus says the LORD the God of Israel: The jar of meal will not be emptied and the jug of oil will not fail until the day that the LORD sends rain on the earth.” 15 She went and did as Elijah said, so that she as well as he and her household ate for many days. 16 The jar of meal was not emptied, neither did the jug of oil fail, according to the word of the LORD that he spoke by Elijah.

Commentary

The Book of Kings is part of the “Deuteronomic History” that includes the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings. These books are a “didactic history” that covered the period from just before the entry into the Promised Land (c.1220 BCE, if the account is historical) to the beginning of Babylonian Captivity (586 BCE). The books were written in the period from 640 BCE to 500 BCE and continued to be revised even after that – long after the events they described.

The authors of the Deuteronomic Books artfully wove their stories from numerous sources. They then used the stories in these books to demonstrate that that God controls history and to assert that it was the failures of the kings of Israel and the kings of Judea to worship YHWH and obey God’s commands that led to the conquest of Northern Israel in 722 BCE by the Assyrians and the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 597 BCE. (The conquests were not seen as the result of the Assyrians’ and Babylonians’ greater wealth and more powerful armies.)

The Book of Kings (to the extent it may be historical) covers from the end of the Reign of David (c. 965 BCE) to the Babylonian Captivity (586 BCE).

Elijah and his successor, Elisha, were two of the great prophets (speakers for YHWH) in Jewish History. They opposed the (mostly) Baal-worshiping kings in Northern Israel for 90 years (from approximately 873 to 784 BCE), and their stories comprise about 40% of the Book of Kings.

Elijah and Elisha are both credited with numerous healings, restoring people to life, and other extraordinary events involving food, such as the one recounted in today’s reading.

Just prior to today’s reading, Elijah confronted the Baal-worshiping King Ahab (873 to 852 BCE) and told Ahab that there would be no rain in Israel until YHWH decided to make it rain (v.1). This pronouncement was fully consistent with one of the major themes of the Book of Kings – that YHWH is in control of everything, rather than the kings or their false gods.

In today’s reading, YHWH directed Elijah to walk about 80 miles from east of the River Jordan to Zarephath (v.9), which is on the Mediterranean coast near Sidon (in modern Lebanon). This area was a center of Baal worship, and the story of the continued supply of meal and oil for the widow shows that YHWH’s powers extend even beyond the lands of Judea and Israel.

Hebrews 9:24-28

Reading

24 Christ did not enter a sanctuary made by human hands, a mere copy of the true one, but he entered into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. 25 Nor was it to offer himself again and again, as the high priest enters the Holy Place year after year with blood that is not his own; 26 for then he would have had to suffer again and again since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the age to remove sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27 And just as it is appointed for mortals to die once, and after that the judgment, 28 so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.

Commentary

The Letter to the Hebrews was an anonymous sermon addressed to both Jewish and Gentile Jesus Followers which urged them to maintain their Faith in the face of persecution.

Although the Letter to the Hebrews is sometimes attributed to Paul, most scholars agree that it was written some time after Paul’s death in 63 CE, but before 100 CE. The letter introduced a number of important theological themes. The first four chapters explored the word of God spoken through the Son.

The Jewish Annotated New Testament observes that Hebrews has a Platonic philosophical orientation resembling that of Philo of Alexandria and that it contains the New Testament’s most sophisticated Greek.

The NOAB and The JANT agree that the author sought to ground his arguments in scripture (using the Septuagint) to argue that Jesus is superior to the Jewish traditions. The JANT states: “Hebrews offers a distinct and elevated Christology. As the Son of God, Jesus is superior to all other beings, including angels — he is uncreated, immortal, and permanent. He is also superior to all biblical heroes, including Moses and Abraham, as well as institutions like the Levitical priesthood. As both perfect sacrifice and heavenly priest who intercedes for humans, Jesus supersedes the Jewish sacrificial system, rendering it obsolete.”

The JANT continues: “Because Hebrews argues for Jesus’ superiority over all else and the obsolescence of the covenant God made with Moses at Mount Sinai, it expresses what scholars call supersessionist theology. Supersessionism is the idea that Christ’s entry into human history replaces all that has come before, including God’s unique covenant bond with Israel. The same idea is sometimes referred to as rejection/replacement theology.”

The author interpreted the life, death, and heavenly role of Jesus through the category of the “high priest’ who perfected the ancient sacrificial system of Judaism (which ended when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE).

The Letter emphasized that Jesus (as high priest) was able to sympathize with our weaknesses because he (as a human) had been tested as we are. The presentation of Jesus as high priest in the Letter to the Hebrews is unique in the Christian Scriptures and reflected the continuing process in early Christianity of developing images to describe who and what Jesus of Nazareth was (and is). The JANT points out that in the First Century, the high priest was chosen by Roman authorities and served at their pleasure.

Today’s reading continued discussing the theme of Jesus of Nazareth as the high priest and uses this image as another way to convey to the Jesus Follower Community “who and what” Jesus was (and is). The author focused on the “once and for all” (v.26) aspects of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection and emphasized that Jesus was both priest and sacrifice in the Crucifixion.

The reading concluded (v.28) with an allusion to what Christians call “the Second Coming” – a theological recognition that not all of Ancient Israel’s (and the Jesus Follower Community’s) expected outcomes of the Messianic Age were accomplished in Jesus’ lifetime or even after the Destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 CE. The JANT says: “Jewish tradition combines the coming of the Messiah with the messianic age; it requires no ‘second coming.’”

Mark 12:38-44

Reading

38 As Jesus taught, he said, “Beware of the scribes, who like to walk around in long robes, and to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces, 39 and to have the best seats in the synagogues and places of honor at banquets! 40 They devour widows’ houses and for the sake of appearance say long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation.”

41 He sat down opposite the treasury and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. 42 A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. 43 Then he called his disciples and said to them, “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. 44 For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on.”

Commentary

The Gospel According to Mark was the first Gospel that was written and is usually dated to the time around the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Mark’s Gospel is the shortest gospel and forms the core for the Gospels According to Matthew and Luke (both of which were written around 85 CE). Over 50% of the material in those two Gospels is based on Mark. Because these three Gospels follow similar chronologies of Jesus’ life and death, they are called “Synoptic Gospels” for the Greek words meaning “Same Look/View.”

Today’s reading comes after a short passage in Mark in which Jesus confounded the scribes by asking them how it can be that the Messiah is David’s son if David (in Psalm 110) referred to the Messiah as LORD. Mark said that this was to the “delight” of the large crowd (Mk. 12:35-37).

Following that exchange, Jesus criticized the scribes for their pretensions (vv.38-39) and the economic hardships they imposed on the poor (v.39). In both Matthew and Luke, the Pharisees were included for condemnation for their pretensions and for imposing economic hardship (Mt. 23; Lk 11:43 and 20:46). The New Jerome Biblical Commentary observes that the scribes were “the ancient Jewish version of lawyers” and that “in antiquity, lawyers could serve as trustees of a widow’s estate. A common way of receiving their fee was to get a share of the estate. Lawyers with a reputation for piety had a good chance of improving their prospects of participating in this process.”

The Pharisees were included in this criticism in Matthew and Luke because the Pharisees, after the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, were the only other group in Judaism (besides the Jesus Followers) to survive. For the next 30 years, the Jesus Followers and the Pharisees contended for the leadership of Judaism — including who would be able to use the synagogues, who would decide which scriptures were authoritative, and how to interpret them.

The contribution by the widow to the Temple is interpreted by the commentator in The New Oxford Annotated Bible as further condemnation of the scribes for “inducing the poor to give their meagre resources to the Temple.” The Jewish Annotated New Testament disagrees and notes that “the text does not suggest that. The Temple is a place where both rich and poor can contribute.”

During this Pentecost Season, there are two “Tracks” of Scriptures that are offered, and congregations may choose which Track they will follow. The first two readings presented are the readings from Tracks 1 and 2, respectively. The last two readings are the same in both Tracks.

Ruth 1:1-18

Reading

1 In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land, and a certain man of Bethlehem in Judah went to live in the country of Moab, he and his wife and two sons. 2 The name of the man was Elimelech and the name of his wife Naomi, and the names of his two sons were Mahlon and Chilion; they were Ephrathites from Bethlehem in Judah. They went into the country of Moab and remained there. 3 But Elimelech, the husband of Naomi, died, and she was left with her two sons. 4 These took Moabite wives; the name of the one was Orpah and the name of the other Ruth. When they had lived there about ten years, 5 both Mahlon and Chilion also died, so that the woman was left without her two sons and her husband.

6 Then she started to return with her daughters-in-law from the country of Moab, for she had heard in the country of Moab that the LORD had considered his people and given them food. 7 So she set out from the place where she had been living, she and her two daughters-in-law, and they went on their way to go back to the land of Judah. 8 But Naomi said to her two daughters-in-law, “Go back each of you to your mother’s house. May the LORD deal kindly with you, as you have dealt with the dead and with me. 9 The LORD grant that you may find security, each of you in the house of your husband.” Then she kissed them, and they wept aloud. 10 They said to her, “No, we will return with you to your people.” 11 But Naomi said, “Turn back, my daughters, why will you go with me? Do I still have sons in my womb that they may become your husbands? 12 Turn back, my daughters, go your way, for I am too old to have a husband. Even if I thought there was hope for me, even if I should have a husband tonight and bear sons, 13 would you then wait until they were grown? Would you then refrain from marrying? No, my daughters, it has been far more bitter for me than for you, because the hand of the LORD has turned against me.” 14 Then they wept aloud again. Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her.

15 So she said, “See, your sister-in-law has gone back to her people and to her gods; return after your sister-in-law.” 16 But Ruth said, “Do not press me to leave you or to turn back from following you! Where you go, I will go; Where you lodge, I will lodge; your people shall be my people, and your God my God.

17 Where you die, I will die— there will I be buried. May the LORD do thus and so to me, and more as well, if even death parts me from you!”

18 When Naomi saw that she was determined to go with her, she said no more to her.

Commentary

The Book of Ruth is one of the shortest books of the Bible (four chapters) and is a beautiful story of a Moabite woman (Ruth) and her devotion to her Jewish mother-in-law, Naomi. In the last chapter of the story, Ruth (with Naomi’s assistance) married a Judean relative of Naomi’s and became the great-grandmother of King David. The New Oxford Annotated Bible says: “The verbal sophistication suggests that the author was a literate member of the upper classes, a court scribe, perhaps.”

It is important to note that the Moabites were always regarded as dire enemies of Judah, and likely despoiled Jerusalem after the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.

The story is set (v.1) in the time of the Judges (1200 to 1025 BCE), a period of great turmoil and moral backsliding in Israel.

In the Christian Scriptures, the book is placed after Judges as if it were an historical book, but in the Hebrew Bible it is placed among the Writings.

There is no consensus on when the book was written. Some suggest that its emphasis on the genealogy of David dates it to the period between the death of Solomon (930 BCE) and the conquest of Northern Israel by the Assyrians in 722 BCE.

The weight of scholarly analysis, however, dates the book to the Persian Period — after the end of the Exile (539 BCE) and before the conquest by Alexander the Great in 333 BCE. A story of a Moabite woman’s being an ancestor of King David has been seen as a reaction against the exclusivist decrees of Ezra and Nehemiah (c.450 BCE) which required Judean men to send away their non-Jewish wives (and their children by these women). The NOAB observes that the values the book proclaims are loyalty, love of family and generosity towards strangers.

In today’s reading, Naomi (whose name means “Pleasantness”), her husband, and their two sons (whose names mean “Sickly” and “Frail”), left Bethlehem and went to Moab because of a famine in Judea. (Ironically, “Beth-lehem” means “House of Bread/Food.”)

In Moab, Naomi’s husband died, and the two sons married Moabite women, Ruth and Orpah. Ten years later, the two sons (not surprisingly) died, and the three women were left destitute.

Naomi decided to return to Judea (where the famine had ended) and urged Ruth and Orpah to stay with their own people in Moab and remarry. Orpah decided to remain in Moab, but Ruth, swearing by YHWH (v.17) “clung” to Naomi and swore “your people shall be my people and your God my God” (v.16).

The Jewish Study Bible notes: “The fidelity and love between Naomi and Roth is the most positive portrayal of women’s relationships in biblical literature.” It goes on to say that “Ruth, Naomi and Boaz are models of hesed, that is, of loyalty and commitment that go beyond the bounds of law or duty.”

In Judaism, Ruth is seen as the ideal convert to Judaism and her words (vv. 16-17) are read today when a person converts to Judaism.

Ruth is one of the four women mentioned in the genealogy in the Gospel According to Matthew 1:1-6. The others are Tamar, Rahab and Bathsheba. The New Jerome Biblical Commentary points out that the sons born to Tamar and Ruth were in fulfillment of their levirate obligations, respectively, to Er (Gen.38:29) and Mahlon (4:17) to bear a son by their deceased husband’s kin.

Next week’s reading supplies the conclusion to the story.

Deuteronomy 6:1-9

Reading

1 Moses said: Now this is the commandment — the statutes and the ordinances — that the LORD your God charged me to teach you to observe in the land that you are about to cross into and occupy, 2 so that you and your children and your children’s children, may fear the LORD your God all the days of your life, and keep all his decrees and his commandments that I am commanding you, so that your days may be long. 3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe them diligently, so that it may go well with you, and so that you may multiply greatly in a land flowing with milk and honey, as the LORD, the God of your ancestors, has promised you.

4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD is our God, the LORD alone. 5 You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. 6 Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. 7 Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise. 8 Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead, 9 and write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.

Commentary

Deuteronomy is the fifth (and last) book of the Torah and (as a literary device) was presented as Moses’ final speech to the Israelites just before they entered the Promised Land.

“Deuteronomy” comes from Greek words that mean “Second Law” and the book was structured as if it were a “restatement” of the laws found in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. Parts of Deuteronomy were revised as late as 450 BCE, but the bulk of the book is generally dated to the reign of King Josiah of Judea (640-609 BCE). Many of the reforms under Josiah, particularly the centralization of sacrificial worship in Jerusalem, are stipulated in Deuteronomy.

It is also the first book of the didactic “Deuteronomic History” which consists of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings. This “History” taught that when the people and kings of Israel and Judea worshiped YHWH properly, they prospered, but when they worshiped false gods, other nations (Assyria in 722 BCE and Babylon in 587 BCE) conquered them. For the Deuteronomists, these conquests occurred because of false worship, not because the Assyrians and Babylonians were wealthier countries with larger armies. In this way, the Deuteronomists “preserved” the beliefs that YHWH was the all-powerful protector of Israel and Judea, YHWH was faithful to the promises made by YHWH, and that YHWH controlled everything that occurred.

Today’s reading is central to the restatement of the Law and directed the teaching of the Law to one’s children, observing of the Law, and reciting the Law when one is at home or away (v.7). It follows the Deuteronomic Decalogue (5:6-21) which is slightly different from the Decalogue in Exodus 20:2-17. The NOAB describes this passage as a “sermon on the first commandment (5:6-10).” The JSB sees it as part of a “sermonic preamble to the laws of chs 12-26.”

There are practices the people should use to keep the Law in mind: the use of phylacteries holding an abstract of the Law tied on one’s arm and forehead (v.8) and the placing a small box (a “mezuzah”) holding a portion of the Law on the upper right doorpost as one enters a home (v.9).

The command (“Hear O Israel”) is called the “Shema” in Hebrew and is the central call to prayer in Judaism. The JSB observes: “Modern readers regard the Shema as an assertion of a monotheism, a view that is anachronistic. In the context of ancient Israelite religion, it served as a public proclamation of exclusive loyalty to YHVH as the sole LORD of Israel. Subsequently, as the Shema became incorporated into the synagogue liturgy, its recitation was also given legal significance. The prayer was regarded as a legally binding oath to carry out the requirements of the Torah.”

This formulation of the First Commandment in verse 5 was cited by Jesus in the Gospel of Mark (12:29-30) as the “First Great Commandment” which recognized (as did the Decalogues) that there may be other gods, but that one’s allegiance must be only to YHWH. Consistent with the over-all theme in Deuteronomy, only by keeping the LORD’s commands would the Israelites prosper in the land promised to them (v. 3).

Hebrews 9:11-14

Reading

11 When Christ came as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation), 12 he entered once for all into the Holy Place, not with the blood of goats and calves, but with his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, with the sprinkling of the ashes of a heifer, sanctifies those who have been defiled so that their flesh is purified, 14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to worship the living God!

Commentary

The Letter to the Hebrews was an anonymous sermon addressed to both Jewish and Gentile Jesus Followers which urged them to maintain their Faith in the face of persecution.

Although the Letter to the Hebrews is sometimes attributed to Paul, most scholars agree that it was written some time after Paul’s death in 63 CE, but before 100 CE. The letter introduced a number of important theological themes. The first four chapters explored the word of God spoken through the Son.

The Jewish Annotated New Testament observes that Hebrews has a Platonic philosophical orientation resembling that of Philo of Alexandria and that it contains the New Testament’s most sophisticated Greek.

The NOAB and The JANT agree that the author sought to ground his arguments in scripture (using the Septuagint) to argue that Jesus is superior to the Jewish traditions. The JANT states: “Hebrews offers a distinct and elevated Christology. As the Son of God, Jesus is superior to all other beings, including angels — he is uncreated, immortal, and permanent. He is also superior to all biblical heroes, including Moses and Abraham, as well as institutions like the Levitical priesthood. As both perfect sacrifice and heavenly priest who intercedes for humans, Jesus supersedes the Jewish sacrificial system, rendering it obsolete.”

The JANT continues: “Because Hebrews argues for Jesus’ superiority over all else and the obsolescence of the covenant God made with Moses at Mount Sinai, it expresses what scholars call supersessionist theology. Supersessionism is the idea that Christ’s entry into human history replaces all that has come before, including God’s unique covenant bond with Israel. The same idea is sometimes referred to as rejection/replacement theology.”

The author interpreted the life, death, and heavenly role of Jesus through the category of the “high priest’ who perfected the ancient sacrificial system of Judaism (which ended when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE).

The Letter emphasized that Jesus (as high priest) was able to sympathize with our weaknesses because he (as a human) had been tested as we are. The presentation of Jesus as high priest in the Letter to the Hebrews is unique in the Christian Scriptures and reflected the continuing process in early Christianity of developing images to describe who and what Jesus of Nazareth was (and is). The JANT points out that in the First Century, the high priest was chosen by Roman authorities and served at their pleasure.

In verses 1 to 10 in Chapter 9, the author described the wilderness tabernacle of Ex. 25-26 and the sacrifices made there.

In today’s reading, the author focused on the “once and for all” aspects of Jesus’ death and Resurrection and emphasized that Jesus was both priest and sacrifice in the Crucifixion. The JANT emphasizes that “Hebrews is interpreting Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection in terms of their salvific efficiency” rather than events assumed to have happened during Jesus’ lifetime. It also notes that Hebrews does not distinguish between ritual and moral purity and that the “eternal Spirit” (v.14) is literally “the spirit of the age” and is not to be understood as the Holy Spirit but rather as divine power.

The references to the Holy Place (v.12), the blood of goats and bulls, and the ashes of the heifer (v. 13) are a mixture of various sacrificial rituals in the Torah, some for cleansing ritual impurity (for example having touched a corpse), and others relating to Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement), when the High Priest entered the Holy of Holies.

Mark 12:28-34

Reading

28 One of the scribes came near and heard the Sadducees disputing with one another, and seeing that Jesus answered them well, he asked him, “Which commandment is the first of all?” 29 Jesus answered, “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; 30 you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ 31 The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.” 32 Then the scribe said to him, “You are right, Teacher; you have truly said that ‘he is one, and besides him there is no other’; 33 and ‘to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the strength,’ and ‘to love one’s neighbor as oneself,’ — this is much more important than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.” 34 When Jesus saw that he answered wisely, he said to him, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” After that no one dared to ask him any question.

Commentary

The Gospel According to Mark was the first Gospel that was written and is usually dated to the time around the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Mark’s Gospel is the shortest gospel and forms the core for the Gospels According to Matthew and Luke (both of which were written around 85 CE). Over 50% of the material in those two Gospels is based on Mark. Because these three Gospels follow similar chronologies of Jesus’ life and death, they are called “Synoptic Gospels” for the Greek words meaning “Same Look/View.”

Today’s reading follows a dispute between Jesus and the Sadducees about future resurrection. The Sadducees were the priestly group (whose name is derived from Zadok, the High Priest under David and Solomon) who were scriptural literalists. The Sadducees rejected the idea of future resurrection because it was not in the Torah itself. The Pharisees, on the other hand, accepted the idea of future resurrection based on the authority of the “Oral Torah” or interpretations of the Law. These interpretations were eventually written down after the First Century and are incorporated in the Talmud. The Sadducees were trying to get Jesus to commit to one position or the other, but he sidestepped their questions.

Scribes were learned teachers and authoritative leaders who were drawn from the priests and Levites as well as the common people. Mark portrayed them as high officials, advisors to the chief priests, and teachers of the Law.

In Matthew and Luke (written 15-20 years after Mark), the Pharisees were presented as the primary opponents to Jesus. This was because the Pharisees, after the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, were the only other group in Judaism (besides the Jesus Followers) to survive. For the next 30 years, the Jesus Followers and the Pharisees contested for the leadership of Judaism — including who would be able to use the synagogues, who would decide which scriptures were authoritative, and how to interpret them.

In Mark, the Sadducees and the scribes were the primary opponents of Jesus, and verse 34a is the only positive description of scribes in this Gospel. Jesus’ response to the scribe quoted Deuteronomy 6:4-5 (one of the readings today) and Lev.19:18. The NAOB points out that the scribe admits (vv.32-33) that love of God and love of neighbor are more important than the elaborate sacrifices at the Temple from which he draws his living. The NJBC observes that the scribe’s comparison “merely echoes Hosea 6:6 and 1 Sam.15:22 and need not be construed as a condemnation of the sacrificial system.”

The JANT notes that a similar question was posed to Hillel, the 1st Century Jewish scholar, who summed up the law with the dictum “Do not do to anyone else what is hateful to you.”

In Matthew’s account of this story, a Pharisee who was also a lawyer asked the question and verses 32 to 34 were not included. In Luke’s account, a lawyer asked the question, and tried to “justify himself” by asking “Who is my neighbor?” This led to the Parable of the Good Samaritan – which is unique to Luke.

During this Pentecost Season, there are two “Tracks” of Scriptures that are offered, and congregations may choose which Track they will follow. The first two readings presented are the readings from Tracks 1 and 2, respectively. The third and fourth readings are the same in both Tracks.

Ruth 3:1-5, 4:13-17

Reading

1 Naomi her mother-in-law said to Ruth, “My daughter, I need to seek some security for you, so that it may be well with you. 2 Now here is our kinsman Boaz, with whose young women you have been working. See, he is winnowing barley tonight at the threshing floor. 3 Now wash and anoint yourself put on your best clothes and go down to the threshing floor; but do not make yourself known to the man until he has finished eating and drinking. 4 When he lies down, observe the place where he lies; then, go and uncover his feet and lie down; and he will tell you what to do.” 5 She said to her, “All that you tell me I will do.”

4:13 So Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife. When they came together, the LORD made her conceive, and she bore a son. 14 Then the women said to Naomi, “Blessed be the LORD, who has not left you this day without next-of-kin; and may his name be renowned in Israel! 15 He shall be to you a restorer of life and a nourisher of your old age; for your daughter-in-law who loves you, who is more to you than seven sons, has borne him.” 16 Then Naomi took the child and laid him in her bosom and became his nurse. 17 The women of the neighborhood gave him a name, saying, “A son has been born to Naomi.” They named him Obed; he became the father of Jesse, the father of David.

Commentary

The Book of Ruth is one of the shortest books of the Bible (four chapters) and is a beautiful story of a Moabite woman (Ruth) and her devotion to her Jewish mother-in-law, Naomi. In the last chapter of the story, Ruth (with Naomi’s assistance) married a Judean relative of Naomi’s and became the great-grandmother of King David.

It is important to note that the Moabites were always regarded as dire enemies of Judah, and likely despoiled Jerusalem after the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.

The story is set (v.1) in the time of the Judges (1200 to 1025 BCE), a period of great turmoil and moral backsliding in Israel. In the Christian Scriptures, the book is placed after Judges as if it were an historical book, but in the Hebrew Bible it is placed among the Writings.

There is no consensus on when the book was written. Some suggest that its emphasis on the genealogy of David dates it to the period between the death of Solomon (930 BCE) and the conquest of Northern Israel by the Assyrians in 722 BCE.

The weight of scholarly analysis, however, dates the book to the Persian Period — after the end of the Exile (539 BCE) and before the conquest by Alexander the Great in 333 BCE. At this time (5th Century BCE), there was a conflict in Judea between the “exclusivists” (Ezra and Nehemiah) who required that all foreign wives (and their children by these women) be sent away, and the “inclusivists” such as the author of Ruth, who was presented as the great-grandmother of the great King David (even though she was a Moabite). The exclusivist/inclusivist controversy continued into the time of Jesus of Nazareth, and beyond.

In last week’s reading, Naomi (whose name means “Pleasantness”), her husband, and their two sons (whose names mean “Sickly” and “Frail”), left Bethlehem and went to Moab because of a famine in Judea. (Ironically, “Beth-lehem” means “House of Bread/Food.”)

In Moab, Naomi’s husband died, and the two sons married Moabite women, Ruth and Orpah. Ten years later, the two sons (not surprisingly) died, and the three women were left destitute.

Naomi decided to return to Judea (where the famine had ended) and urged Ruth and Orpah to stay with their own people in Moab and remarry. Orpah decided to remain in Moab, but Ruth “clung” to Naomi and swore “your people shall be my people and your God my God” (v.16).

After going to Judea with Naomi, Ruth gleaned the already harvested fields belonging to Boaz, a kinsman of Naomi’s, to obtain grain for herself and Naomi.

In today’s reading, Naomi instructed Ruth to go to the threshing floor where Boaz would be sleeping and “uncover his feet” (v.4). This could be understood literally, but most commentators point out that “feet” is a euphemism in Hebrew for private parts. In the same scene, Ruth asked Boaz to “spread his robe” (v.9) over her – a formal act of a proposal of marriage.

Boaz redeemed land that had been owned by Naomi’s husband Elimelech and married Ruth. Commentators agree that it is not likely that Naomi became Obed’s wet nurse, but that the child symbolized the complete reversal of Naomi’s fortunes. The Jewish Study Bible speculates that “the association of the child with Naomi rather than Ruth is meant to remove the taint of foreign birth from the child.”

Ruth is one of four women included in the genealogy of Jesus of Nazareth in Matthew’s Gospel. The others are Tamar (who seduced her father-in-law, Judah, and bore him two sons), Rahab (a prostitute in Jericho who was the mother of Boaz), and Bathsheba (the mother of Solomon who was married to Uriah when David seduced her).

1 Kings 17:8-16

Reading

8 The word of the LORD came to Elijah, saying, 9 “Go now to Zarephath, which belongs to Sidon, and live there; for I have commanded a widow there to feed you.” 10 So he set out and went to Zarephath. When he came to the gate of the town, a widow was there gathering sticks; he called to her and said, “Bring me a little water in a vessel, so that I may drink.” 11 As she was going to bring it, he called to her and said, “Bring me a morsel of bread in your hand.” 12 But she said, “As the LORD your God lives, I have nothing baked, only a handful of meal in a jar, and a little oil in a jug; I am now gathering a couple of sticks, so that I may go home and prepare it for myself and my son, that we may eat it, and die.” 13 Elijah said to her, “Do not be afraid; go and do as you have said; but first make me a little cake of it and bring it to me, and afterwards make something for yourself and your son. 14 For thus says the LORD the God of Israel: The jar of meal will not be emptied and the jug of oil will not fail until the day that the LORD sends rain on the earth.” 15 She went and did as Elijah said, so that she as well as he and her household ate for many days. 16 The jar of meal was not emptied, neither did the jug of oil fail, according to the word of the LORD that he spoke by Elijah.

Commentary

Elijah and his successor, Elisha, were two of the great prophets (speakers for YHWH) in Jewish History. They opposed the (mostly) Baal-worshiping kings in Northern Israel for 90 years (from approximately 873 to 784 BCE), and their stories comprise about 40% of the Book of Kings.

The authors of the Book of Kings were also the authors of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges and Samuel. These books were given their final form around 500 BCE – long after the events they described. The authors used the stories in these books to demonstrate that it was the failures of the Kings of Israel and the Kings of Judea to worship YHWH and obey God’s commands that led to the conquest of Northern Israel in 722 BCE by the Assyrians and the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 597 BCE. (The conquests were not seen as the result of the Assyrians’ and Babylonians’ greater wealth and more powerful armies.)

Elijah and Elisha are both credited with numerous healings, restoring people to life, and other extraordinary events involving food, such as the one recounted in today’s reading.

Just prior to today’s reading, Elijah confronted the Baal-worshiping King Ahab (873 to 852 BCE) and told Ahab that there would be no rain in Israel until YHWH decided to make it rain (v.1). This pronouncement was fully consistent with one of the major themes of the Book of Kings – that YHWH is in control of everything, rather than the kings or their false gods.

In today’s reading, YHWH directed Elijah to walk about 80 miles from east of the River Jordan to Zarephath (v.9), which is on the Mediterranean coast near Sidon (in modern Lebanon). This area was a center of Baal worship, and the story of the continued supply of meal and oil for the widow shows that YHWH’s powers extend even beyond the lands of Judea and Israel.

Hebrews 9:24-28

Reading

24 Christ did not enter a sanctuary made by human hands, a mere copy of the true one, but he entered into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf. 25 Nor was it to offer himself again and again, as the high priest enters the Holy Place year after year with blood that is not his own; 26 for then he would have had to suffer again and again since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the age to remove sin by the sacrifice of himself. 27 And just as it is appointed for mortals to die once, and after that the judgment, 28 so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.

Commentary

The Letter to the Hebrews was an anonymous sermon addressed to both Jewish and Gentile Jesus Followers which urged them to maintain their Faith in the face of persecution.

Although the Letter to the Hebrews is sometimes attributed to Paul, most scholars agree that it was written sometime after Paul’s death in 63 CE, but before 100 CE. The letter introduced many important theological themes.

The author, in large part, interpreted the life, death, and heavenly role of Jesus through the category of the “high priest’ who perfected the ancient sacrificial system of Judaism which ended when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE.

Earlier parts of the letter emphasized that Jesus (as high priest) was able to sympathize with our weaknesses because he (as a human) had been tested as we are. The presentation of Jesus as high priest in the Letter to the Hebrews is unique in the Christian Scriptures and reflected the continuing process in early Christianity of developing images to describe who and what Jesus of Nazareth was (and is).

Today’s reading continued discussing the theme of Jesus of Nazareth as the high priest and uses this image as another way to convey to the Jesus Follower Community “who and what” Jesus was (and is). The author focused on the “once and for all” (v.26) aspects of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection and emphasized that Jesus was both priest and sacrifice in the Crucifixion.

The reading concluded with an allusion to the Second Coming – a theological recognition that not all of Ancient Israel’s (and the Jesus Follower Community’s) expected outcomes of the Messianic Age were accomplished in Jesus’ lifetime or even after the Destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 CE.

Mark 12:38-44

Reading

38 As Jesus taught, he said, “Beware of the scribes, who like to walk around in long robes, and to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces, 39 and to have the best seats in the synagogues and places of honor at banquets! 40 They devour widows’ houses and for the sake of appearance say long prayers. They will receive the greater condemnation.”

41 He sat down opposite the treasury and watched the crowd putting money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. 42 A poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, which are worth a penny. 43 Then he called his disciples and said to them, “Truly I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury. 44 For all of them have contributed out of their abundance; but she out of her poverty has put in everything she had, all she had to live on.”

Commentary

The Gospel According to Mark was the first Gospel that was written and is usually dated to the time around the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Mark’s Gospel is the shortest gospel and forms the core for the Gospels According to Matthew and Luke (both of which were written around 85 CE). Over 50% of the material in those two Gospels is based on Mark. Because these three Gospels follow similar chronologies of Jesus’ life and death, they are called “Synoptic Gospels” for the Greek words meaning “Same Look/View.”

Today’s reading comes after a short passage in Mark in which Jesus confounded the scribes by asking them how it can be that the Messiah is David’s son if David (in Psalm 110) referred to the Messiah as LORD. Mark said that this was to the “delight” of the large crowd (Mk. 12:35-37).

Following that exchange, Jesus criticized the scribes for their pretensions (vv.38-39) and the economic hardships they imposed on the poor (v.39). In both Matthew and Luke, the Pharisees were included for condemnation for their pretensions and imposing economic hardship (Mt. 23; Lk 11:43 and 20:46).

The Pharisees were included in this criticism in Matthew and Luke because the Pharisees, after the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, were the only other group in Judaism (besides the Jesus Followers) to survive. For the next 30 years, the Jesus Followers and the Pharisees contested for the leadership of Judaism — including who would be able to use the synagogues, who would decide which scriptures were authoritative, and how to interpret them.

The contribution by the widow to the Temple is interpreted by the commentator in the New Oxford Annotated Bible as further condemnation of the scribes for “inducing the poor to give their meagre resources to the Temple.” The Jewish Annotated New Testament disagrees and notes that “the text does not suggest that. The Temple is a place where both rich and poor can contribute.”

During this Pentecost Season, there are two “Tracks” of Scriptures that are offered, and congregations may choose which Track they will follow. The first two readings presented are the readings from Tracks 1 and 2, respectively. The third and fourth readings are the same in both Tracks.

Ruth 1:1-18

Reading

1 In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land, and a certain man of Bethlehem in Judah went to live in the country of Moab, he and his wife and two sons. 2 The name of the man was Elimelech and the name of his wife Naomi, and the names of his two sons were Mahlon and Chilion; they were Ephrathites from Bethlehem in Judah. They went into the country of Moab and remained there. 3 But Elimelech, the husband of Naomi, died, and she was left with her two sons. 4 These took Moabite wives; the name of the one was Orpah and the name of the other Ruth. When they had lived there about ten years, 5 both Mahlon and Chilion also died, so that the woman was left without her two sons and her husband.

6 Then she started to return with her daughters-in-law from the country of Moab, for she had heard in the country of Moab that the LORD had considered his people and given them food. 7 So she set out from the place where she had been living, she and her two daughters-in-law, and they went on their way to go back to the land of Judah. 8 But Naomi said to her two daughters-in-law, “Go back each of you to your mother’s house. May the LORD deal kindly with you, as you have dealt with the dead and with me. 9 The LORD grant that you may find security, each of you in the house of your husband.” Then she kissed them, and they wept aloud. 10 They said to her, “No, we will return with you to your people.” 11 But Naomi said, “Turn back, my daughters, why will you go with me? Do I still have sons in my womb that they may become your husbands? 12 Turn back, my daughters, go your way, for I am too old to have a husband. Even if I thought there was hope for me, even if I should have a husband tonight and bear sons, 13 would you then wait until they were grown? Would you then refrain from marrying? No, my daughters, it has been far more bitter for me than for you, because the hand of the LORD has turned against me.” 14 Then they wept aloud again. Orpah kissed her mother-in-law, but Ruth clung to her.

15 So she said, “See, your sister-in-law has gone back to her people and to her gods; return after your sister-in-law.” 16 But Ruth said, “Do not press me to leave you or to turn back from following you! Where you go, I will go; Where you lodge, I will lodge; your people shall be my people, and your God my God.

17 Where you die, I will die— there will I be buried. May the LORD do thus and so to me, and more as well, if even death parts me from you!”

18 When Naomi saw that she was determined to go with her, she said no more to her.

Commentary

The Book of Ruth is one of the shortest books of the Bible (four chapters) and is a beautiful story of a Moabite woman (Ruth) and her devotion to her Jewish mother-in-law, Naomi. In the last chapter of the story, Ruth (with Naomi’s assistance) married a Judean relative of Naomi’s and became the great-grandmother of King David.

It is important to note that the Moabites were always regarded as dire enemies of Judah, and likely despoiled Jerusalem after the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 587 BCE.

The story is set (v.1) in the time of the Judges (1200 to 1025 BCE), a period of great turmoil and moral backsliding in Israel.

In the Christian Scriptures, the book is placed after Judges as if it were an historical book, but in the Hebrew Bible it is placed among the Writings.

There is no consensus on when the book was written. Some suggest that its emphasis on the genealogy of David dates it to the period between the death of Solomon (930 BCE) and the conquest of Northern Israel by the Assyrians in 722 BCE.

The weight of scholarly analysis, however, dates the book to the Persian Period — after the end of the Exile (539 BCE) and before the conquest by Alexander the Great in 333 BCE. A story of a Moabite woman being an ancestor of King David was a reaction against the exclusivist decrees of Ezra and Nehemiah (c.450 BCE) which required Judean men to send away their non-Jewish wives (and their children by these women).

In today’s reading, Naomi (whose name means “Pleasantness”), her husband, and their two sons (whose names mean “Sickly” and “Frail”), left Bethlehem and went to Moab because of a famine in Judea. (Ironically, “Beth-lehem” means “House of Bread/Food.”)

In Moab, Naomi’s husband died, and the two sons married Moabite women, Ruth and Orpah. Ten years later, the two sons (not surprisingly) died, and the three women were left destitute.

Naomi decided to return to Judea (where the famine had ended) and urged Ruth and Orpah to stay with their own people in Moab and remarry. Orpah decided to remain in Moab, but Ruth “clung” to Naomi and swore “your people shall be my people and your God my God” (v.16).

In Judaism, Ruth is seen as the ideal convert to Judaism and these words (vv. 16-17) are read today when a person converts to Judaism.

Next week’s reading supplies the conclusion to the story.

Deuteronomy 6:1-9

Reading

1 Moses said: Now this is the commandment — the statutes and the ordinances — that the LORD your God charged me to teach you to observe in the land that you are about to cross into and occupy, 2 so that you and your children and your children’s children, may fear the LORD your God all the days of your life, and keep all his decrees and his commandments that I am commanding you, so that your days may be long. 3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe them diligently, so that it may go well with you, and so that you may multiply greatly in a land flowing with milk and honey, as the LORD, the God of your ancestors, has promised you.

4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD is our God, the LORD alone. 5 You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might. 6 Keep these words that I am commanding you today in your heart. 7 Recite them to your children and talk about them when you are at home and when you are away, when you lie down and when you rise. 8 Bind them as a sign on your hand, fix them as an emblem on your forehead, 9 and write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.

Commentary

Deuteronomy is the fifth (and last) book of the Torah and is presented as Moses’ final speech to the Israelites just before they entered the Promised Land. “Deuteronomy” comes from Greek words that mean “Second Law” and is structured as a “restatement” of the laws found in the books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers. Parts of it were revised as late as 450 BCE, but the bulk of the book is generally dated to the reign of King Josiah of Judea (640-609 BCE).

Today’s reading is central to the restatement of the Law and directed the teaching of the Law to one’s children, observing of the Law, and reciting the Law when one is at home or away (v.7).

There are practices to keep the Law in mind: the use of phylacteries holding an abstract of the Law tied on one’s arm and forehead (v.8) and the placing a small box (a “mezuzah”) holding a portion of the Law on the upper right doorpost as one enters a home (v.9).

The command (“Hear O Israel”) is called the “Shema” in Hebrew and is the central call to prayer in Judaism. This formulation of the First Commandment (Ex. 20:2-6) in verse 5 was cited by Jesus in the Gospel of Mark (12:29-30) as the “First Great Commandment.” It recognized (as did the Decalogue) that there may be other gods, but that one’s allegiance must be only to YHWH. Consistent with the over-all theme in Deuteronomy, only by keeping the LORD’s commands would the Israelites prosper in the land promised to them (v. 3).

Hebrews 9:11-14

Reading

11 When Christ came as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation), 12 he entered once for all into the Holy Place, not with the blood of goats and calves, but with his own blood, thus obtaining eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, with the sprinkling of the ashes of a heifer, sanctifies those who have been defiled so that their flesh is purified, 14 how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to worship the living God!

Commentary

The Letter to the Hebrews was an anonymous sermon addressed to both Jewish and Gentile Jesus Followers which urged them to maintain their Faith in the face of persecution.

Although the Letter to the Hebrews is sometimes attributed to Paul, most scholars agree that it was written sometime after Paul’s death in 63 CE, but before 100 CE. The letter introduced many important theological themes.

The author, in large part, interpreted the life, death, and heavenly role of Jesus through the category of the “high priest’ who perfected the ancient sacrificial system of Judaism which ended when the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE.

The letter emphasized that Jesus (as high priest) was able to sympathize with our weaknesses because he (as a human) had been tested as we are. The presentation of Jesus as high priest in the Letter to the Hebrews is unique in the Christian Scriptures and reflected the continuing
process in early Christianity of developing images to describe who and what Jesus of Nazareth was (and is).

In verses 1 to 10 in Chapter 9, the author described the wilderness tabernacle of Ex. 25-26 and the sacrifices made there.

In today’s reading, the author focused on the “once and for all” aspects of Jesus’ death and Resurrection and emphasized that Jesus was both priest and sacrifice in the Crucifixion. The references to the Holy Place (v.12), the blood of goats and bulls, and the ashes of the heifer (v. 13) are a mixture of various sacrificial rituals in the Torah, some for cleansing ritual impurity for having touched a corpse, and others relating to Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement), when the High Priest entered the Holy of Holies.

The reading concluded with an allusion to the Second Coming – a theological recognition that not all of Ancient Israel’s (and the Jesus Follower Community’s) expected outcomes of the Messianic Age were accomplished in Jesus’ lifetime or even after the Destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 CE.

Mark 12:28-34

Reading

28 One of the scribes came near and heard the Sadducees disputing with one another, and seeing that Jesus answered them well, he asked him, “Which commandment is the first of all?” 29 Jesus answered, “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; 30 you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ 31 The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.” 32 Then the scribe said to him, “You are right, Teacher; you have truly said that ‘he is one, and besides him there is no other’; 33 and ‘to love him with all the heart, and with all the understanding, and with all the strength,’ and ‘to love one’s neighbor as oneself,’ — this is much more important than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.” 34 When Jesus saw that he answered wisely, he said to him, “You are not far from the kingdom of God.” After that no one dared to ask him any question.

Commentary

The Gospel According to Mark was the first Gospel that was written and is usually dated to the time around the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE. Mark’s Gospel is the shortest gospel and forms the core for the Gospels According to Matthew and Luke (both of which were written around 85 CE). Over 50% of the material in those two Gospels is based on Mark. Because these three Gospels follow similar chronologies of Jesus’ life and death, they are called “Synoptic Gospels” for the Greek words meaning “Same Look/View.”

Today’s reading follows a dispute between Jesus and the Sadducees about future resurrection. The Sadducees were the priestly group (whose name is derived from Zadok, the High Priest under David and Solomon) who were scriptural literalists. The Sadducees rejected the idea of future resurrection because it was not in the Torah itself. The Pharisees, on the other hand, accepted the idea of future resurrection based on the authority of the “Oral Torah” or interpretations of the Law. These interpretations were eventually written down after the First Century and are incorporated in the Talmud. The Sadducees were trying to get Jesus to commit to one position or the other, but he sidestepped their questions.

Scribes were learned teachers and authoritative leaders who were drawn from the priests and Levites as well as the common people. Mark portrayed them as high officials, advisors to the chief priests, and teachers of the Law.

In Matthew and Luke (written 15-20 years after Mark), the Pharisees were presented as the primary opponents to Jesus. This was because the Pharisees, after the Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE, were the only other group in Judaism (besides the Jesus Followers) to survive. For the next 30 years, the Jesus Followers and the Pharisees contested for the leadership of Judaism — including who would be able to use the synagogues, who would decide which scriptures were authoritative, and how to interpret them.

In Mark, the Sadducees and the scribes were the primary opponents of Jesus, and verse 34 is the only positive description of scribes in this Gospel. Jesus’ response to the scribe quoted Deuteronomy 6:4-5 (one of the readings today) and Lev.19:18.

In Matthew’s account of this story, a Pharisee who was also a lawyer asked the question and verses 32 to 34 were not included. In Luke’s account, a lawyer asked the question, and tried to “justify himself” by asking “Who is my neighbor?” This led to the Parable of the Good Samaritan – which is unique to Luke.

In some denominations, two different readings from the Hebrew Bible are available, and one is chosen to be read.

Track 1: Ruth 3:1-5, 4:13-17

The Book of Ruth is one of the shortest books of the Bible (four chapters) and is a beautiful story of a Moabite woman (Ruth) and her devotion to her Jewish mother-in-law, Naomi.
It is important to note that the Moabites were always regarded as dire enemies of Judah.

In the chapters leading up to today’s reading, Naomi, her husband, and their two sons (whose names meant “Sickly” and “Frail”), left Bethlehem and went to Moab because of a famine in Judea. (Ironically, Beth-lehem means “House of Bread/Food”.) In Moab, the husband died, and the two sons married Moabite women, Ruth and Orpah. Ten years later, the two sons (not surprisingly) died, and the three women were left destitute. Naomi decided to return to Judah and urged Ruth and Orpah to stay with their own people in Moab and remarry. Orpah decided to remain in Moab, but Ruth “clung” to Naomi and swore “your people shall be my people and your God my God.” (These are words read today when a person converts to Judaism.)

In Judah, Ruth worked in fields owned by Boaz, a kinsman. In the first part of today’s reading, Naomi advised Ruth to lie down on the threshing floor where Boaz was lying down and “uncover his feet” (v.5). In the Hebrew Bible, “feet” is usually a euphemism for “private parts,” so Naomi’s advice has a clear sexual overtone. In the conclusion of today’s reading, Boaz and Ruth married and had a son, Obed, the father of Jesse, who was the father of David.

At the time the Book of Ruth was written (5th Century BCE), there was a conflict in Judea between the “exclusivists” (Ezra and Nehemiah) who required that all foreign wives be sent away, and the “inclusivists” such as the author of Ruth, who (even though she was a Moabite) was presented as the great-grandmother of the great King David. The exclusivist/inclusivist controversy continued into the time of Jesus of Nazareth, and beyond.

Track 2: 1 Kings 17:8-16

Elijah and his successor, Elisha, were two of the great prophets (speakers for YHWH) in Jewish History. They opposed the (mostly) Baal-worshiping kings in Northern Israel for 90 years (from approximately 873 to 784 BCE), and their stories comprise about 40% of the Book of Kings.

The authors of the Book of Kings were also the authors of the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges and Samuel. These books were given their final form around 550 BCE – long after the events they described. The authors used the stories in these books to demonstrate that it was the failures of the Kings of Israel and the Kings of Judea to worship YHWH and obey God’s commands that led to the conquest of Northern Israel in 722 BCE by the Assyrians and the conquest of Judea by the Babylonians in 597 BCE. (The conquests were not seen as the result of the Assyrians’ and Babylonians’ greater wealth and more powerful armies.)

Elijah and Elisha are both credited with numerous healings, restoring people to life, and other extraordinary events involving food, such as the one recounted in today’s reading.

Just prior to today’s reading, Elijah confronted the Baal-worshiping King Ahab (873 to 852 BCE) and told Ahab that there would be no rain in Israel until YHWH decided to make it rain. This pronouncement was fully consistent with one of the major themes of the Book of Kings – that YHWH is in control, rather than the kings or their false gods.

In today’s reading, YHWH directed Elijah to walk about 80 miles from east of the River Jordan to Zarephath, which is on the Mediterranean coast near Sidon (in modern Lebanon). This area was a center of Baal worship, and the story of the continued supply of meal and oil for the widow shows that YHWH’s powers extend even beyond the lands of Judea and Israel.

Hebrews 9:24-28

Although the Letter to the Hebrews is sometimes attributed to Paul, most scholars agree that it was written sometime after Paul’s death in 62 CE, but before 100 CE. The letter was addressed to Jesus Followers who had suffered persecution and it introduced a number of important theological themes. The first four chapters explored the word of God spoken through the Son.

Today’s reading continues discussing the theme of Jesus of Nazareth as the high priest and uses this image as another way of conveying to the Jesus Follower Community “who and what” Jesus was (and is). The author focuses on the “once and for all” aspects of Jesus’ Death and Resurrection, and emphasizes that Jesus was both priest and sacrifice in the Crucifixion. The reading concludes with an allusion to the Second Coming – a theological recognition that not all of Ancient Israel’s (and the Jesus Follower Community’s) expected outcomes of the Messianic Age were accomplished in Jesus’ lifetime or even after the Destruction of the Temple by the Romans in 70 CE.